Export limit exceeded: 416200 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (416200 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126263 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-13 | 9.4 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126229 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated administrator to access to other VDOMs via specially crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119518 | 2 Wordpress-extensions, Wp Royal | 2 Royal Elementor Addons, Royal Elementor Addons | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WProyal Royal Elementor Addons royal-elementor-addons allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through 1.7.1070. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125816 | 2 Pt Norther Lights Production, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Mapsvg, Mapsvg | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PT Norther Lights Production MapSVG mapsvg-lite-interactive-vector-maps allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MapSVG: from n/a through 9.0.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125800 | 2 Brainstormforce, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Spectra, Spectra | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Spectra ultimate-addons-for-gutenberg allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Spectra: from n/a through 2.20.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-124759 | 1 Rt-labs | 1 P-net | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| P-Net before 1.0.4 routes a received RTA alarm frame to an Application Relationship using only the destination alarm reference in the frame, without checking the source of the frame. A host with ADJACENT network access can abort an established Application Relationship with a single alarm ERROR frame, or deliver forged alarm notifications with chosen type, slot, subslot, USI and payload to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-124758 | 1 Rt-labs | 1 P-net | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| P-Net before 1.0.4 does not check the record data length of an IODWrite request to a non-user record index against the size of the record block header. The 32-bit length is reduced by the header size before it is passed to the record handlers, so a length smaller than the header underflows and the handlers receive a data length of about 65530. The fixed-size reads of the I&M and PDPort handlers can then read past the end of the session buffer. The result of the write is discarded. The attacker must have an established Application Relationship or be able to send in the context of one, and requires ADJACENT network access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-124760 | 1 Rt-labs | 1 P-net | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| P-Net before 1.0.4 sets the alarm receiver state to waiting for confirmation before the data of a received alarm notification is parsed. If the parsing fails the state is not restored, and later alarm notifications of the same priority are discarded without acknowledge until the Application Relationship is released. The Application Relationship and the cyclic data exchange keep working. The attacker must be able to send an alarm notification in the context of an established Application Relationship and requires ADJACENT network access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-124762 | 1 Rt-labs | 1 P-net | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| P-Net before 1.0.4 finds the RPC session of a received PDU by its activity UUID only, and a reject, fault or cancel PDU for the session aborts the Application Relationship, without checking that the PDU is the answer to a call of the device or where it comes from. A host with ADJACENT network access that has observed the activity UUID of the connection, which is sent in clear in every RPC request, can abort the Application Relationship with one PDU. It also allocates a session for an unknown activity UUID and changes the address stored for an existing session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-129135 | 1 Privateoctopus | 1 Picoquic | 2026-11-13 | 3.7 Low |
| picoquic before 2026.11.05.3e2e3d3 contains an integer overflow vulnerability in picoquic_decode_time_stamp_frame() that allows remote QUIC peers to corrupt stored timestamps by sending oversized TIME_STAMP values. Attackers on connections negotiating the TIME_STAMP extension can send large values shifted by ack_delay_exponent to wrap the result, corrupting RTT and bandwidth estimation and degrading congestion control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-124279 | 1 Elixir-grpc | 1 Grpc Server | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc_server allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server memory via client-streaming or bidirectional-streaming requests. The streaming read clause of GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler.info/3 (grpc_server/lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex) asks Cowboy for up to 8,000,000 bytes per read and compares the running total with max_body_size only after the read returns. The gRPC length prefix of a message is not checked before the message is buffered. Each stream can therefore buffer up to one full read beyond the configured limit before it is refused, and many concurrent streams exhaust node memory. Releases before 1.0.6 apply no limit to streaming requests at all. This issue affects grpc_server: from 1.0.0 before 1.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121809 | 1 Elixir-grpc | 2 Grpc, Grpc Server | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc_server and grpc allows unauthenticated attackers to occupy a BEAM scheduler indefinitely via a client-streaming or bidirectional-streaming request whose body ends inside a gRPC message. GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.read_stream/1 (grpc_server/lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy.ex, and the Cowboy adapter in grpc before the package split) asks for more data whenever the buffer does not hold a complete message. Once the request body has ended, every further read returns an empty chunk, so the buffer never changes and the function retries without end. A single 5-byte length prefix sent with END_STREAM keeps one scheduler busy for as long as the connection stays open, and repeated requests exhaust all schedulers. This issue affects grpc_server: from 1.0.0 before 1.1.0; grpc: from 0.3.1 before 1.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0195 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-13 | 4.0 Medium |
| In fill of dma.rs, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds stack read during direct memory access fills due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126230 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands or cause a denial of service via specially crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126226 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted report schedule name. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126232 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.5 High |
| A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow a MITM attacker to impersonate the radius server via a rogue RADIUS server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126243 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain pre-required id and data via other means. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126234 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in a template engine vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 may allow an authenticated attacker with restricted privileges to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specially crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126221 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11 may allow an authenticated administrator to read or write arbitrary files or execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests to the GUI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126219 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11 may allow an authenticated administrator to read or write arbitrary files or execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests to the GUI. | ||||