Export limit exceeded: 411204 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (411204 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-47400 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44605 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the RPM Package Manager (RPM). A local user could be affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability when processing a specially crafted NDB database file. This issue arises from an error in how RPM handles certain calculations during file parsing, leading to an incorrect memory allocation. An attacker could leverage this to cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3633 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 4 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.9 Low |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. A remote attacker, by controlling the method parameter of the `soup_message_new()` function, could inject arbitrary headers and additional request data. This vulnerability, known as CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) injection, occurs because the method value is not properly escaped during request line construction, potentially leading to HTTP request injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3632 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 4 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.9 Low |
| A flaw was found in libsoup, a library used by applications to send network requests. This vulnerability occurs because libsoup does not properly validate hostnames, allowing special characters to be injected into HTTP headers. A remote attacker could exploit this to perform HTTP smuggling, where they can send hidden, malicious requests alongside legitimate ones. In certain situations, this could lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), enabling an attacker to force the server to make unauthorized requests to other internal or external systems. The impact is low, as SoupServer is not actually used in internet infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3161 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.6.0, and 2.3.6.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3295 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2026-11-06 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.6.0, and 2.3.6.1 is vulnerable to cross site scripting. The web app user‑supplied input is not properly sanitized or HTML‑encoded before being stored and rendered. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by entering specially crafted payloads containing malicious JavaScript which are saved within the app and later executed automatically when user views affected pages, resulting in Stored Cross‑Site Scripting (Stored XSS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-58927 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 6.7 Medium |
| The vulnerability is a Use-After-Free (UAF) in the EVS AIDL HAL, arising from a data race on an unsynchronized `std::weak_ptr` within `EvsEnumerator::openCamera()`. Specifically, concurrent calls from a privileged UID (e.g., `AID_AUTOMOTIVE_EVS`) can cause a torn `weak_ptr` state, leading to a virtual call through a freed object's vtable at `cameraObj->getCameraInfo(&desc)`. This allows for potential arbitrary code execution within the `hal_evs_default` process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19256 | 2026-11-06 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The All In One Login WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not adequately restrict the number of attempts that can be made against the short numeric code used by its default-enabled passwordless email login, and does not feed those failed attempts into its own brute-force protection, allowing unauthenticated attackers to take over any account including administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4418 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.6.0, and 2.3.6.1 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remotely authenticated attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8355 | 1 Ibm | 3 Contextforge, Contextforge-mcp-gateway, Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 0.1.0 through 1.0.5 is vulnerable to a server-side request Forgery (SSRF) that allows authenticated users with gateway creation privileges to perform arbitrary HTTP POST requests to internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. The vulnerability occurs during OAuth-enabled gateway registration when the system fails to validate the oauth_config.token_url parameter. When registering a gateway with OAuth client credentials authentication, an attacker can supply a malicious token_url pointing to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints (AWS IMDSv1, GCP, Azure), or localhost-bound services. The application immediately performs an HTTP POST request to the attacker-controlled URL with form-encoded credentials in the body. If the response cannot be parsed as a valid OAuth token response, up to 256 characters of the response body are reflected back to the attacker in the HTTP 502 error message. This vulnerability bypasses existing SSRF protections that are applied to the gateway.url field but not to OAuth configuration parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3234 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Mod Proxy Cluster, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in mod_proxy_cluster. This vulnerability, a Carriage Return Line Feed (CRLF) injection in the decodeenc() function, allows a remote attacker to bypass input validation. By injecting CRLF sequences into the cluster configuration, an attacker can corrupt the response body of INFO endpoint responses. Exploitation requires network access to the MCMP protocol port, but no authentication is needed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3184 | 3 Kernel, Linux, Redhat | 7 Util-linux, Util-linux, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in util-linux. Improper hostname canonicalization in the `login(1)` utility, when invoked with the `-h` option, can modify the supplied remote hostname before setting `PAM_RHOST`. A remote attacker could exploit this by providing a specially crafted hostname, potentially bypassing host-based Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) access control rules that rely on fully qualified domain names. This could lead to unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28295 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the FTP GVfs backend. A malicious FTP server can exploit this vulnerability by providing an arbitrary IP address and port in its passive mode (PASV) response. The client unconditionally trusts this information and attempts to connect to the specified endpoint, allowing the malicious server to probe for open ports accessible from the client's network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2340 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 11 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 8 more | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2708 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 4 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A request smuggling vulnerability exists in libsoup's HTTP/1 header parsing logic. The soup_message_headers_append_common() function in libsoup/soup-message-headers.c unconditionally appends each header value without validating for duplicate or conflicting Content-Length fields. This allows an attacker to send HTTP requests containing multiple Content-Length headers with differing values. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7907 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| Reserved 2019 Magento 1 ID with no published record. Linked to VULN-9633 but never published; left REJECTED after the 2026-11-06 review of wrongly rejected IDs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9797 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 3 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's administrative services (org.keycloak.services.resources.admin). A highly privileged attacker, authenticated with a 'manage-clients' role, could exploit this vulnerability through several methods, including manipulating client JSON Web Key Sets (JWKS), swapping client authenticator types and resetting secrets, or downloading legitimate signing keys. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to obtain a token with 'realm-admin' role assignments, leading to privilege escalation and potential unauthorized access to sensitive resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97718 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| CVE-2026-97718 Is a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in version 14.60 of the Secure Access server. Because of a bypassed security control, an attacker can cause an admin to create an account under their control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97635 | 1 Agent-zero | 1 Agent-zero | 2026-11-06 | 8.1 High |
| The Agent Zero Web UI before 1.15 does not correctly sanitize user-provided input in chat messages or file uploads. When Agent Zero reproduces content in the chat interface, any injected JavaScript is executed in the context of the victim’s authenticated Agent Zero Web UI session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97367 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-11-06 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak Account REST API where it incorrectly handles session identification. A malicious client owner can manipulate their own security tokens to point to a different user's active session. This allows the attacker to access and modify the victim's account information, potentially leading to a full account takeover by changing the recovery email and resetting the password. | ||||