Export limit exceeded: 21533 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11469 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11469 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-112609 | 1 Apple | 1 Ios And Ipados | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86925 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, visionOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48884 | 2 Wedevs, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp User Frontend, Wp User Frontend | 2026-10-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs WP User Frontend wp-user-frontend allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP User Frontend: from n/a through 4.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112685 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72825 | 1 Getgrav | 2 Grav, Grav-plugin-api | 2026-10-29 | 7.6 High |
| The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.13 contains an API-key scope cap bypass in the POST /reports/twig-content/allowlist endpoint (ReportsController). The endpoint enforces requirePermission('api.config.write') followed by a bare isSuperAdmin() check instead of requireSuper(). Because isSuperAdmin() reads access.api.super directly and never consults api_key_scopes, a least-privilege API key scoped to api.config.write minted on a super account passes the gate, allowing an attacker to append attacker-chosen tokens to the security.twig_sandbox allowlist (persisted to user/config/security.yaml). Widening the allowlist turns any subsequent Twig-in-content render into an SSTI/RCE sink. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114489 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule's owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114477 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in the REST metrics route of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to read the server-wide traffic history. GET /api/v1/metrics/history returns the server's traffic counters over the last 30 days; those counters are server-wide and carry no domain, which is why the report routes already refuse the same counters to a credential confined to named domains. The metrics route was not among the routes the server's authorization gate refuses a confined credential and its handler was not given the caller, so a domain administrator, an account given another role that holds view_configuration in named domains (the auditor role given a domain list among them), or an API key issued for named domains could read the whole server's traffic totals rather than its own domains'. The disclosure is of aggregate operational counters, not of any message or account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114475 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing authorization in the REST role-management routes of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to modify a custom role that accounts in other domains hold, and to create custom roles and delete any that no account holds. The routes that create, update and delete a custom role require the manage_roles permission, which only the serveradmin role holds; but a full-scope API key issued for named domains, and serveradmin assigned with a domain list, are serveradmin confined to those domains and hold manage_roles. The server's authorization gate did not refuse the three role routes to a confined credential and the route named no domain, so a credential issued to one tenant could raise or lower the permissions of a custom role assigned across other tenants - granting another domain's role every permission over its mailboxes and settings, or removing what it needs. A custom role may not hold administer_server, administer_domain or manage_roles, so the confined credential cannot make itself or another a server administrator by creating or rewriting a custom role. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112706 | 1 Apple | 4 Ios And Ipados, Tvos, Visionos and 1 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112701 | 1 Apple | 1 Ios And Ipados | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112533 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42690 | 2 Thimpress, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Learnpress, Learnpress | 2026-10-29 | 5.4 Medium |
| Subscriber Broken Access Control in LearnPress <= 4.4.10 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112675 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed with additional entitlement checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86920 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65397 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112559 | 1 Apple | 4 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos and 1 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43736 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73608 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-10-29 | 8.6 High |
| SiYuan's development branch (endpoint introduced by commit 9b8e8956f, not present in v3.7.3 or master, patched in v3.7.4-alpha.3) contains a missing-authorization vulnerability in the /api/av/getAttributeViewSearchTarget endpoint. The route is registered with CheckAuth only and performs no authorization checks (no CheckReadonly, no publish-access or encrypted-notebook gating). Given a database identifier taken from a published page and a keyword, an anonymous reader can query the endpoint to retrieve matching database row content, including rows that publish filters (FilterAttributeViewByPublishAccess) would otherwise withhold. No released stable version is affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72791 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-10-29 | 5.8 Medium |
| SiYuan v3.7.4-alpha.1 (a pre-release; the endpoint does not exist in stable v3.7.3 or earlier) contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews endpoint. The route is registered with CheckAuth only and applies no publish-access filtering, so reader-role callers can retrieve the complete database view structure — every view's name, icon, layout type, and per-field Hidden flag — for any database whose avID is supplied, regardless of authorization. The issue was introduced by commit acfc02ee8 and fixed in v3.7.4-alpha.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25448 | 2026-10-29 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs WP ERP erp allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP ERP: from n/a through 1.17.10. | ||||