Export limit exceeded: 47579 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (47579 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-77694 | 2 Eventin, Wordpress | 2 Eventin, Wordpress | 2026-08-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.19 does not properly restrict which changes a guest checkout token is allowed to authorise on an order, allowing unauthenticated users to mark their own unpaid order as completed and be issued a valid paid ticket with no payment taken. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80195 | 1 Kimai | 1 Kimai | 2026-08-26 | 5.4 Medium |
| Kimai before 2.63.0 contains a business logic / improper authorization vulnerability in the team update API endpoint (PATCH /api/teams/{id}), which removes all existing team members before validating the submitted replacement member list. An authenticated teamlead (or other user) with permission to edit a team can submit a malformed members payload; although Kimai returns a validation error, the existing membership rows have already been deleted. This bypasses the dedicated member-removal endpoint's protection against removing teamleaders and can leave a team with no members or teamleaders, disrupting team-based access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79769 | 1 Nokogiri | 1 Nokogiri | 2026-08-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| Nokogiri versions before 1.19.4 contain a possible invalid (out-of-bounds) memory read in the protected internal Node#initialize_copy_with_args helper behind Node#dup and #clone, which unwrapped its source argument as an xmlNode without a type check. If application code calls this protected method with a non-Node argument (e.g., a Namespace), it reads an xmlNs out of bounds, crashing the process. This is only triggerable by a programming error and cannot be triggered by untrusted input or normal use of the public API. Only CRuby is affected. Version 1.19.4 adds a type check and raises TypeError. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79673 | 2 Ech0, Lin-snow | 2 Ech0, Ech0 | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Ech0 before 4.4.3 protects the PUT /user endpoint with the profile:read scope, a read-only scope, but allows write operations including password changes. An attacker with an admin's profile:read access token can change the admin's password and login to obtain an unrestricted session token that bypasses all scope enforcement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76847 | 1 Nektos | 1 Act | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| act starts an HTTP Artifacts V4 backend whenever a workflow uses actions/upload-artifact@v4 or actions/download-artifact@v4. The control-plane RPCs of that backend, including CreateArtifact, GetSignedArtifactURL, ListArtifacts, FinalizeArtifact and DeleteArtifact, accept a caller-supplied workflow_run_backend_id and never check that it belongs to the requester: validateRunIDV4 in pkg/artifacts/artifacts_v4.go parses the value and returns it with the comparison against the requesting task's run ID left commented out. The signed URLs the backend issues are authenticated by an HMAC whose key is hardcoded to the four bytes 0xba 0xdb 0xee 0xf0, identical in every build, computed over a concatenation of endpoint, expiry, artifact name and task ID with no length prefix or delimiter, so signatures are both forgeable and ambiguous between differing artifact name and task ID pairs. The --artifact-server-addr flag defaults to the host's outbound address rather than loopback, leaving the backend reachable from the surrounding network. Any client that can reach it may read, overwrite or delete the artifacts of a concurrently running job with no credentials, exposing build outputs such as secrets and deployment credentials and permitting their replacement before the owning job consumes them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71933 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain unauthorized operation vulnerabilities in multiple syslog functions. The vulnerability is caused by missing authorization checks. A remote attacker can trigger these vulnerabilities via crafted requests to modify configuration, restart services, save startup configuration, or clear logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78956 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-73048 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-08-26 | 5.8 Medium |
| SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getRefIDsByFileAnnotationID endpoint that returns block identifiers citing PDF annotations without publish-access filtering. Attackers can extract block identifiers from restricted documents by supplying annotation identifiers visible in published pages, revealing citation relationships across forbidden and password-protected tiers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73059 | 1 Stoatchat | 1 Stoatchat | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| stoatchat before 0.15.0 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in the message_fetch route that checks only ViewChannel permission instead of requiring ReadMessageHistory. Attackers with ViewChannel access but ReadMessageHistory denied can retrieve individual message content by ID, bypassing the intended history restriction enforced by bulk read routes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72811 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-08-26 | 10 Critical |
| SiYuan versions <= v3.7.2 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the backlink/mention search query (kernel/model/backlink.go), which concatenates stored block metadata (title, name, alias, anchor text) and the client-supplied keyword into a SQL MATCH/search statement while escaping only the double-quote character and not the single quote. A single quote in the client keyword (first-order, reachable by an anonymous or RoleReader user on the publish surface) or in stored document metadata (second-order) breaks out of the string literal. Because the query runs on the main read-write siyuan.db handle via a statement-stacking-capable driver, an attacker can execute arbitrary SQL, enabling cross-notebook read and write. Fixed in v3.7.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58444 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| Personal access token scope enforcement bypass on the repository home page (`GET /{owner}/{repo}`) discloses private repository contents | ||||
| CVE-2026-58417 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| REST API exposes organization membership of private organizations to public | ||||
| CVE-2026-58425 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| OAuth token introspection returns metadata of tokens issued to other clients (RFC 7662 section 4 violation) | ||||
| CVE-2026-58431 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| Public-only API token restriction is not enforced on team API routes | ||||
| CVE-2026-78468 | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-78270. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-78270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-78270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80532 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: fix another iunlink infinite loop bug in online fsck xrep_iunlink_resolve_bucket is supposed to reconstruct as much of the incore prev and next unlinked list pointers based on what it finds on disk and in memory before we move on to relinking the truly lost inodes back into the unlinked list. However, it's still vulnerable to infinite loops that come in via the next_unlinked pointers. Fix this problem by remembering which inodes we've already seen and checking new agino pointers against that. If a bit is already set, either this is a loop or the inode has nonzero link count. We'll deal with the second case in a subsequent patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16734 | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Stripe Payment Forms by WP Full Pay WordPress plugin before 8.5.2 does not verify that the caller owns the Stripe payment intent referenced by two unauthenticated payment-form AJAX actions, allowing an unauthenticated visitor — using a nonce that is embedded in every public page containing a payment form — to change the amount of a payment intent that the Stripe Payment Forms by WP Full Pay WordPress plugin before 8.5.2 then updates server-side through the Stripe API with the store's secret key. An ownership check added in 8.5.0 was applied to only one payment-intent handler, leaving the pricing-recalculation and payment-intent-update actions unprotected against amount manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76391 | 1 Splunk | 1 Ai Toolkit | 2026-08-26 | 8.3 High |
| In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run searches with system-level privileges, access all relevant data, affect system integrity, and read or delete search jobs belonging to other users through Agent Run History. The improper privilege management is possible because the Agent Run History handler replaces the calling user session key with a system authentication token before it performs search operations. For more information see AI Toolkit Agent Launchpad (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/apply-machine-learning/use-ai-toolkit/6.0.0/ai-toolkit-connections-containers-and-agents/ai-toolkit-agent-launchpad) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76343 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could execute attacker-chosen Structured Query Language (SQL) queries through the Data Orchestration jobs endpoint, allowing for access to substantially all data stored by Data Orchestration, including jobs owned by other users and stored connection credentials. The vulnerability is possible because Data Orchestration builds a database query from user-controlled job filter values without using parameterized queries. For more information see About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76342 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-08-26 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store risky Search Processing Language (SPL) commands in a Table Editor dataset and share the dataset. A user who holds the "admin" Splunk role triggers the commands when that user opens the dataset in the Table Editor. The commands run using the permissions of the second user and could expose all relevant data and modify lookup files. The vulnerability is possible because the Table Editor does not apply SPL safeguards for risky commands to the field-summary search that it runs for the Initial Data step. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user who holds the "power" Splunk role should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see SPL safeguards for risky commands (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/best-practices-for-splunk-platform-security/spl-safeguards-for-risky-commands) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||