Export limit exceeded: 16307 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 47400 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (47400 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-90951 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Paid Member Subscriptions | 2026-09-28 | 3.7 Low |
| The Paid Membership Subscriptions WordPress plugin before 3.1.0 does not bind one of its unauthenticated payment actions to the requesting user, allowing someone who holds another member's in-flight payment identifier to delete that member's checkout state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91024 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Booking Manager | 2026-09-28 | 6.8 Medium |
| The Booking Manager WordPress plugin before 2.1.21 does not sanitize and escape values taken from a fetched external iCalendar feed before using them in a SQL query, allowing authenticated users with Author-level access and above to perform SQL injection attacks by importing a feed they control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93507 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wc Fields Factory | 2026-09-28 | 3.3 Low |
| The WC Fields Factory WordPress plugin before 4.1.11 does not properly restrict access to, or verify a nonce for, a post-cloning action, allowing Contributor-level users and above to duplicate arbitrary posts of any type or status, including other users' private or draft content, and gain read access to the resulting copy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93508 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wc Fields Factory | 2026-09-28 | 8.1 High |
| The WC Fields Factory WordPress plugin before 4.1.11 does not properly restrict access to its field-management AJAX action, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber-level access and above to create, modify and delete arbitrary post meta on any post, including WooCommerce products, regardless of ownership, and to manipulate stored pricing rules on a product to reduce its checkout price. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93510 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Points And Rewards For Woocommerce | 2026-09-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Points and Rewards for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.10.4 does not validate the claimed reward amount or restrict who can call its Win Wheel claim handler, allowing authenticated users, Subscriber and above, to credit their own account with an arbitrary and unlimited amount of loyalty points and, where a companion wallet Points and Rewards for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.10.4 is active, wallet balance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6831 | 2 Vsourz, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Advanced Contact Form 7 Db, Advanced Contact Form 7 Db | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Advanced Contact form 7 DB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to missing authorization in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.9. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to read all Contact Form 7 submission data via the 'acf7db' shortcode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87848 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Mpcx Lightbox | 2026-09-28 | 3.7 Low |
| The MPCX Lightbox WordPress plugin 1.2.2 through 1.2.5 does not have any authorisation or authentication on one of its AJAX actions available to unauthenticated users, nor does it check the status of the requested post, allowing unauthenticated visitors to retrieve the title, content or excerpt of arbitrary posts, including private, draft, pending, trashed and password-protected ones. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97176 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Single Sign-on | 2026-09-28 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Level of Authentication enforcement mechanism of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. The issue occurs when a client specifically requires a higher security level for a user who already has an active session at a lower level. Due to a logic error in how session re-evaluations are handled, Keycloak may incorrectly issue a token at the lower security level instead of enforcing the required higher level, potentially allowing unauthorized access to sensitive resources that rely on these security claims. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3253 | 2 Mailerlite, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Mailerlite Signup Forms, Mailerlite-signup Forms | 2026-09-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| The MailerLite – Signup forms (official) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the forms() method of the AdminController class in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.21. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to create or delete arbitrary signup forms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4806 | 2 Alexvtn, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Custom Thank You Page For Woocommerce, Custom Thank You Page For Woocommerce | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Custom Thank You Page for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and loss of data due to a missing capability check on the save_option() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to to export or reset(delete) the plugin's settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89303 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Post Voting System | 2026-09-28 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Post Voting System WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not properly sanitize and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL query, allowing any authenticated user to perform SQL injection attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93000 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Sps-suite | 2026-09-28 | 6.8 Medium |
| The SPS-Suite WordPress plugin through 1.4.0 does not sanitise the search query before using it in a SQL query when its static-page search feature is enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89300 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Verify Api | 2026-09-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Verify API WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have any authorisation check in one of its REST routes, allowing unauthenticated users to insert arbitrary data into its own database table, as well as to make the site send templated verification emails to arbitrary email addresses. The route is not rate limited either. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86595 | 1 Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. | 1 Envision | 2026-09-28 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. EnVision allows SQL Injection. This issue affects enVision: before 260655. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96538 | 1 Enterprisedb | 1 Warehousepg | 2026-09-28 | N/A |
| WarehousePG (WHPG) 7.x before 7.6.0-WHPG is affected by a missing authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) in the built-in server-side file functions pg_file_write(text,text,bool), pg_file_rename(text,text,text), pg_file_unlink(text), and pg_logdir_ls(). These functions are executable by any authenticated database role with no GRANT required, because the REVOKE that contrib/adminpack applies to the equivalent functions was never carried over to WHPG core when their catalog entries were repointed to the ungated adminpack-derived implementations as part of Greenplum's merge to a PostgreSQL 12 base. A non-superuser can use pg_file_write, pg_file_rename, and pg_file_unlink to create, overwrite (append), rename, and delete files under the data and log directories, and can use pg_logdir_ls() to enumerate log file names. Because postgresql.auto.conf resides in the data directory, a non-superuser can append configuration directives such as shared_preload_libraries or archive_command to it, resulting in arbitrary code execution as the postgres operating system user on the next server restart or configuration reload. WarehousePG 6.x is not affected, as the equivalent functions there enforce a superuser check internally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101131 | 1 Deepseek-ai | 1 Deepseek-harness | 2026-09-28 | 3.3 Low |
| A vulnerability was identified in deepseek-ai deepseek-harness up to 0.1.5-rc.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file packages/e2b/e2b/src/index.ts of the component dsh. The manipulation of the argument E2B_API_KEY leads to reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101105 | 1 Code-projects | 1 Matrimonial System | 2026-09-28 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in code-projects Matrimonial System 1.0. The affected element is the function processprofile_form of the file /create_profile of the component Profile Creation Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument fname causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92470 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-09-28 | 7.7 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 19.2.7, 19.3 before 19.3.3, and 19.4 before 19.4.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access sensitive CI/CD variable values from debug-mode job traces through the Duo AI troubleshooting feature due to missing authorization checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92529 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-09-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.2.7, 19.3 before 19.3.3, and 19.4 before 19.4.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to bypass admin-configured AI tool governance controls for workflows in namespaces they do not control due to improper authorization checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45762 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2026-09-28 | 7.5 High |
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5, Suricata's IP defragmentation tracker lookup did not verify that an existing tracker used the same IP address family as the packet being processed. Under crafted fragmented IPv4/IPv6 traffic, an IPv6 fragment could be associated with an IPv4 defragmentation tracker. This can lead to a remote packet-triggered crash and denial of service when Suricata performs the relevant defragmentation. Versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5 contain a fix. As a workaround, if using Suricata as an IDS with AF_PACKET, enabling AF_PACKET's `defrag` option may prevent Suricata from seeing such fragmented packets. | ||||