Export limit exceeded: 11790 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 24707 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24707 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-45591 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 8 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 5 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.5 High |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45491 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 6 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 3 more | 2026-06-10 | 6.2 Medium |
| Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43485 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 12 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 9 more | 2026-06-09 | 7.5 High |
| .NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-43484 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 28 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 25 more | 2026-06-09 | 7.5 High |
| .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-43483 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 28 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 25 more | 2026-06-09 | 7.5 High |
| .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38229 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 7 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 4 more | 2026-06-09 | 8.1 High |
| .NET and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-4366 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-09 | 5.8 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak, an identity and access management solution, where it improperly follows HTTP redirects when processing certain client configuration requests. This behavior allows an attacker to trick the server into making unintended requests to internal or restricted resources. As a result, sensitive internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints could be accessed. This issue may lead to information disclosure and enable attackers to map internal network infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3238 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 4 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform and 1 more | 2026-06-09 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s WINS server component when running as an Active Directory Domain Controller. The WINS protocol handlers for certain request types did not properly validate incoming packets, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a NULL pointer dereference and crash the WINS service using specially crafted UDP packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42271 | 3 Berriai, Litellm, Redhat | 3 Litellm, Litellm, Openshift Ai | 2026-06-08 | 8.8 High |
| LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.74.2 to before version 1.83.7, two endpoints used to preview an MCP server before saving it — POST /mcp-rest/test/connection and POST /mcp-rest/test/tools/list — accepted a full server configuration in the request body, including the command, args, and env fields used by the stdio transport. When called with a stdio configuration, the endpoints attempted to connect, which spawned the supplied command as a subprocess on the proxy host with the privileges of the proxy process. The endpoints were gated only by a valid proxy API key, with no role check. Any authenticated user — including holders of low-privilege internal-user keys — could therefore run arbitrary commands on the host. This issue has been patched in version 1.83.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50265 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-08 | 7.0 High |
| This CVE ID was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2026-50292 | ||||
| CVE-2026-10533 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-08 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Container Platform. Completed pods with restartPolicy: Never do not count toward ResourceQuota pod limits, and Kubernetes events are not quota-scoped. A non-privileged user who can create pods in a namespace can exploit this to generate a large volume of events that accumulate in etcd, causing API server performance degradation across the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11569 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2026-06-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Quay. The filedrop endpoint accepts any mime type without validation, allowing an authenticated user with repository write access to upload a malicious SVG file containing JavaScript. The file is stored and served inline through the CDN, enabling stored cross-site scripting when a victim visits the archive URL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0707 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-06-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. The Keycloak Authorization header parser is overly permissive regarding the formatting of the "Bearer" authentication scheme. It accepts non-standard characters (such as tabs) as separators and tolerates case variations that deviate from RFC 6750 specifications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-36499 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openvswitch | 2026-06-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A missing upper-bound check in the udpif_set_threads() function of Open vSwitch v3.6.90 allows an attacker with OVSDB write access to request an excessive number of handler or revalidation threads. This can cause a denial of service (DoS) via resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57849 | 1 Redhat | 2 Fuse, Jboss Fuse | 2026-06-05 | 6.4 Medium |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Fuse images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41283 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Mistral, Openstack-mistral | 2026-06-05 | 9.9 Critical |
| OpenStack Mistral through 22.0.0 allows Arbitrary Remote Code Execution when the API is exposed. There are endpoints that allow code execution, which can lead to exfiltration of service credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37978 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-03 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A low-privilege administrator with the 'view-clients' role can exploit this by invoking the 'evaluate-scopes' Admin API endpoints with an arbitrary user ID (userId) parameter. This vulnerability allows for cross-role personally identifiable information (PII) leakage, enabling unauthorized visibility into user identities and authorizations across the realm. Exploitation is possible remotely via network access to the Admin API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37981 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A broken access control vulnerability in the Account Resources user lookup endpoint allows a remote authenticated user, who owns at least one User-Managed Access (UMA) resource, to enumerate and harvest personally identifiable information (PII) for all realm users. By sending crafted requests with arbitrary usernames or email values, the endpoint returns full profile objects for unrelated users. This leads to broad profile-level information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37982 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This authentication vulnerability allows a remote attacker to replay `ExecuteActionsActionToken` tokens within Keycloak's WebAuthn (Web Authentication) flow. By intercepting an execute-actions email link, an attacker can register their own authenticator to a victim's account. This leads to unauthorized enrollment of a hardware-backed credential, enabling persistent account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4630 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated client could exploit an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Authorization Services Protection API endpoint. By knowing or obtaining a resource's unique identifier (UUID) belonging to another Resource Server within the same realm, the client could bypass authorization checks. This allows the client to perform unauthorized GET, PUT, and DELETE operations on resources, leading to information disclosure and potential unauthorized modification or deletion of data. | ||||