Export limit exceeded: 410734 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (410734 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-122053 | 1 Sensiolabs | 1 Symfony | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Symfony Serializer component ObjectNormalizer treats any attribute name containing . (and, from Symfony 6.4, [) as a writable property path, allowing untrusted input to modify properties of nested objects and bypass their #[Ignore] metadata attribute in Symfony versions 5.4.41 prior to 5.4.56, 6.4.9 prior to 6.4.50, 7.0.9 prior to 7.1.0, 7.1.2 prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11. ObjectNormalizer::isAllowedAttribute() accepts such names, and setAttributeValue() hands the name straight to PropertyAccessor::setValue(), which parses it as a property path and traverses into the nested object. A payload key such as customer.admin writes to $order->customer->admin. The #[Ignore] metadata attribute is only consulted when the nested object is denormalized in its own right, never when it is reached through a path. #[Groups] restrictions are not bypassed: the path is only accepted when no groups are passed in the context, and then groups restrict nothing. When the root class carries neither #[Ignore] nor #[Groups], no allowlist applies and every key of the payload is let through. Because PropertyAccessor also resolves a path segment against public methods, a segment matching a public method name invokes that method with the attacker’s value.Applications that bind untrusted input to objects are affected, including controllers using #[MapRequestPayload] or #[MapQueryString], whose default normalizer is ObjectNormalizer. With OBJECT_TO_POPULATE, as used for partial updates, the traversal reaches an already hydrated entity graph, and the modified field may be persisted. The fix accepts a property path only when the class metadata declares an attribute of that exact name. Declared paths keep working unchanged, and a path in the payload with no matching declaration is ignored. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101547 | 1 Oracle | 1 Demand Planning | 2026-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Demand Planning product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1 and 12.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Demand Planning. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Demand Planning, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Demand Planning accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101532 | 1 Oracle | 1 Edi Gateway | 2026-11-06 | 7.2 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle EDI Gateway product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: All Miscellaneous EDI Issues). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle EDI Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle EDI Gateway. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101519 | 1 Oracle | 1 Edi Gateway | 2026-11-06 | 7.2 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle EDI Gateway product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: All Miscellaneous EDI Issues). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle EDI Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle EDI Gateway. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-69050 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 6 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680 and 3 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Out-of-bounds memory access in a device driver due to improper resource state tracking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69066 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 5 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 2200 and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Memory corruption in GPU driver due to improper validation of VMID reservation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69002 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 4 Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680, Exynos 2500 and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Incorrect authorization in Samsung framework services due to missing permission checks | ||||
| CVE-2026-68991 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 2 Exynos 1480, Exynos 2400 | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| In the Samsung Exynos ENN NeuralNetworks HAL, improper input validation during request processing can cause memory corruption and lead to a denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68990 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 6 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680 and 3 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| In the Samsung Exynos H-Arx DRM plugin, improper input validation during buffer operations can cause memory corruption, potentially leading to denial of service or privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69025 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 2 Exynos 1480, Exynos 2400 | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| In the Exynos NPU driver, improper validation of user input in the ioctl handler can lead to an out-of-bounds write, which causes a denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-69068 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 2 Exynos Modem 5300, Exynos Modem 5400 | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Insufficient length validation in the GNSS firmware loader may lead to corruption of kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69006 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 15 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1380 and 12 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Insufficient validation of length fields in the GNSS firmware loader can result in kernel‑memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68985 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 3 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 2200 | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| In the Samsung Exynos NPU driver, improper validation of user input in the ioctl handler can lead to an out-of-bounds write, which causes a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69005 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 6 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680 and 3 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in NPU driver parameter processing due to insufficient bounds checking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68984 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 10 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1480 and 7 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| In the Samsung Exynos NPU kernel driver, an integer overflow allows an unprivileged application to trigger memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48183 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 6 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680 and 3 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Improper permission handling during buffer operations allows untrusted applications to create memory mappings with inappropriate permissions | ||||
| CVE-2026-68994 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 4 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 2400 and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| A double free vulnerability in NPU driver due to improper pointer management (941) | ||||
| CVE-2026-68993 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 2 Exynos 1480, Exynos 2400 | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| A double free vulnerability in NPU driver due to improper pointer management (940) | ||||
| CVE-2026-48186 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 13 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1380 and 10 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Improper handling of messages before AS security activation can cause unexpected behavior | ||||
| CVE-2026-48178 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 4 Exynos 2200, Exynos 2400, Exynos 2500 and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Out of bound access in PPC due to race condition in global variable access | ||||