Export limit exceeded: 414287 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11076 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-64253 | 1 Wordpress | 2 Health Check & Troubleshooting, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in WordPress.org Health Check & Troubleshooting health-check allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Health Check & Troubleshooting: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0683 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| In its default configuration, Contec Health CMS8000 Patient Monitor transmits plain-text patient data to a hard-coded public IP address when a patient is hooked up to the monitor. This could lead to a leakage of confidential patient data to any device with that IP address or an attacker in a machine-in-the-middle scenario. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41254 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| STOMP over WebSocket applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass that allows an attacker to send unauthorized messages. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.11 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.23 * 6.0.x - 6.0.29 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.45 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected. MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.12OSS6.1.x6.1.24 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 6.0.xN/A Out of support https://spring.io/projects/spring-framework#support 5.3.x5.3.46 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CreditThis vulnerability was discovered and responsibly reported by Jannis Kaiser. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24907 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Overview The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize '.../...//' (doubled triple dot slash) sequences that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. (CWE-35) Description Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 10.2.0.2, including 9.3.x and 8.3.x, do not sanitize a user input used as a file path through the CGG Draw API. Impact This allows attackers to traverse the file system to access files or directories that are outside of the restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6320 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The ScrollTo Top plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'options_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59132 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Badi Jones Duplicate Content Cure duplicate-content-cure allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Duplicate Content Cure: from n/a through <= 1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36906 | 1 P5 | 2 Fnip-4xsh, Fnip-8x16a | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted form. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20221 | 1 Telesquare | 2 Sdt-cs3b1, Sdt-cs3b1 Firmware | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Telesquare SKT LTE Router SDT-CS3B1 version 1.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting missing request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that perform administrative actions when visited by logged-in users, enabling command execution with router privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4712 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| Information disclosure in the Widget: Cocoa component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34749 | 1 Payloadcms | 1 Payload | 2026-04-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. Prior to version 3.79.1, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made. This issue has been patched in version 3.79.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34228 | 1 Emlog | 1 Emlog | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.8, the backend upgrade interface accepts remote SQL and ZIP URLs via GET parameters. The server first downloads and executes the SQL file, then downloads the ZIP file and extracts it directly into the web root directory. This process does not validate a CSRF token. Therefore, an attacker only needs to trick an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious link to achieve arbitrary SQL execution and arbitrary file write. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5918 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2020-26141 | 4 Alfa, Cisco, Redhat and 1 more | 191 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, Ip Conference Phone 8832 and 188 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The Wi-Fi implementation does not verify the Message Integrity Check (authenticity) of fragmented TKIP frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject and possibly decrypt packets in WPA or WPA2 networks that support the TKIP data-confidentiality protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4401 | 2 Wordpress, Wpchill | 2 Wordpress, Download Monitor | 2026-04-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Download Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the `actions_handler()` and `bulk_actions_handler()` methods in `class-dlm-downloads-path.php` in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.10. This is due to missing nonce verification on these functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete, disable, or enable approved download paths via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39848 | 1 10ij | 1 Dockyard | 2026-04-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dockyard is a Docker container management app. Prior to 1.1.0, Docker container start and stop operations are performed through GET requests without CSRF protection. A remote attacker can cause a logged-in administrator's browser to request /apps/action.php?action=stop&name=<container> or /apps/action.php?action=start&name=<container>, which starts or stops the target container. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-29521 | 2 Hereta, Shenzhen Hereta Technology | 3 Eth-imc408m, Eth-imc408m Firmware, Hereta Eth-imc408m | 2026-04-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit forged requests using automatically-included HTTP Basic Authentication credentials to add RADIUS accounts, alter network settings, or trigger diagnostics. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25682 | 1 Victoralagwu | 1 Cmssite | 2026-04-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| CMSsite 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting crafted pages that submit POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like source=add_user, source=edit_user, or del=1 to create, modify, or delete admin accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4141 | 2 Edckwt, Wordpress | 2 Quran Translations, Wordpress | 2026-04-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Quran Translations plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the quran_playlist_options() function that handles the plugin's settings page. The function processes POST requests to update plugin options via update_option() without any wp_nonce_field() in the form or wp_verify_nonce()/check_admin_referer() verification before processing. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings (toggling display options for PDF, RSS, podcast, media player links, playlist title, and playlist code) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33373 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration Suite | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Web Client due to the issuance of authentication tokens without CSRF protection during certain account state transitions. Specifically, tokens generated after operations such as enabling two-factor authentication or changing a password may lack CSRF enforcement. While such a token is active, authenticated SOAP requests that trigger token generation or state changes can be performed without CSRF validation. An attacker could exploit this by inducing a victim to submit crafted requests, potentially allowing sensitive account actions such as disabling two-factor authentication. The issue is mitigated by ensuring CSRF protection is consistently enforced for all issued authentication tokens. | ||||