| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2004. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2581. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2581. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2581 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit for all platforms contains a vulnerability in nvdisasm, where an attacker can cause an out-of-bounds read issue by deceiving a user into reading a malformed ELF file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3606. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4206. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4206. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4206 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| NVIDIA Jetson Linux contains a vulnerability in NvGPU where error handling paths in GPU MMU mapping code fail to clean up a failed mapping attempt. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service, code execution, and escalation of privileges. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3695. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3695. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3695 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2585. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2585. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2585 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5137. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5137. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5137 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0985. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0985. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0985 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was assigned in 2005 to an issue that would not be published until 2006, so new identifiers were assigned. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |